As someone
who is hoping to work with data closely in the future I have been paying
particularly close attention to the way that my organization handles privacy
concerns. The most striking part of my orientation at UWMC was the cyber
security discussion in which it seemed that they almost had contempt for the
new employees. There were definite undertones of “please just do the
really simple stuff we tell you. We’re not asking for much” and yet resignation
that new staff wouldn’t heed any of those requests. Trying for a scared
straight approach may work for some people but won’t work for everyone.
The people who are having to work with computers regularly understand the
risks but I still get the feeling that most staff, especially clinical, haven’t
fully registered the dangers of security breaches to the organization.
We are in
the middle of changing over UWMC’s regulations with regards to has access to
quality data and there are numerous conversations going on about who
understands what to do with PHI. On the one hand, it would be nice to
give physicians more direct access to data that might be able to involve
clinical care but at the same time the more people who can open up or download
spreadsheets with PHI, the greater the chance that it slips out and costs the
organization millions of dollars. Is requiring a few hours of training
enough to safeguard the hospital? I have not been in the room for any of
those discussions but I’m sure there is a ton of hand wringing going on about
displaying that information where people other than analysts are the first
people to vet it.
No comments:
Post a Comment